On 06/06/2017 09:20 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Michael.
>
> It would have been better to continue debugging in the prev thread.
> This still seems incorrect for the same reason as before.
>
> On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:09:40AM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
>> On NUMA systems with dynamic p
Hello,
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:34:05AM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> >> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> >> index c74bf39..460de61 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> >> @@ -3366,6 +3366,9 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(
Hello, Michael.
It would have been better to continue debugging in the prev thread.
This still seems incorrect for the same reason as before.
On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 09:09:40AM -0500, Michael Bringmann wrote:
> On NUMA systems with dynamic processors, the content of the cpumask
> may change over
On NUMA systems with dynamic processors, the content of the cpumask
may change over time. As new processors are added via DLPAR operations,
workqueues are created for them. Depending upon the order in which CPUs
are added/removed, we may run into problems with the content of the
cpumask used by
