On Thu, Jan 03, 2008 at 12:26:27PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
>
> +static struct of_platform_driver ucc_uart_of_driver = {
> +.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +.name = "ucc_uart",
> >>> Maybe better fsl,ucc_uart?
> >
> > fsl,qe-uart is de
Timur Tabi wrote:
> Scott Wood wrote:
>
> +static struct of_platform_driver ucc_uart_of_driver = {
> +.owner = THIS_MODULE,
> +.name = "ucc_uart",
Maybe better fsl,ucc_uart?
>>
>> fsl,qe-uart is defined by Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt.
>
> Wait,
Scott Wood wrote:
+static struct of_platform_driver ucc_uart_of_driver = {
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+ .name = "ucc_uart",
>>> Maybe better fsl,ucc_uart?
>
> fsl,qe-uart is defined by Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt.
Wait, I'm confused. What does t
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 04:10:54PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>
> >> + [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> >> + device_type = "serial";
> >> + compatible = "ucc_uart";
> >> + model = "UCC";
> >
> > model isn't used, is it needed
Anton Vorontsov wrote:
>> +[EMAIL PROTECTED] {
>> +device_type = "serial";
>> +compatible = "ucc_uart";
>> +model = "UCC";
>
> model isn't used, is it needed at all?
I have no idea, but all the other UCC nodes have it, so I'
On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 10:44:30AM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote:
> Add support for UART serial ports using a Freescale QUICC Engine
> (found on some MPC83xx and MPC85xx SOCs).
>
> Updated booting-without-of.txt to define new properties for a QE UART node,
> and a new node definition that describes uplo
Add support for UART serial ports using a Freescale QUICC Engine
(found on some MPC83xx and MPC85xx SOCs).
Updated booting-without-of.txt to define new properties for a QE UART node,
and a new node definition that describes uploaded QE firmware.
Because of a silicon bug in some QE-enabled SOCs (e
