On Mon 18-11-24 10:25:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I do not see this patch staged in any tree (e.g. linux-next). Is this on
> > its way to be merged?
>
> I only now found it -- it doesn't look super urgent. I'll get it into a
> git t
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> I do not see this patch staged in any tree (e.g. linux-next). Is this on
> its way to be merged?
I only now found it -- it doesn't look super urgent. I'll get it into a
git tree after -rc1.
On Mon 18-11-24 10:25:17, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:04:18AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I do not see this patch staged in any tree (e.g. linux-next). Is this on
> > its way to be merged?
>
> I only now found it -- it doesn't look super urgent. I'll get it into a
> git t
I do not see this patch staged in any tree (e.g. linux-next). Is this on
its way to be merged?
Thanks!
On Tue 29-10-24 11:21:28, Nysal Jan K.A. wrote:
> On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE
> is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op.
> In membarrier_mm_sync_cor
Hi!
On Tue, Oct 29, 2024 at 11:21:28AM +0530, Nysal Jan K.A. wrote:
> On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE
> is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op.
> In membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() the compiler does not
> eliminate redundant branches and load of
"Nysal Jan K.A." writes:
> On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE
> is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op.
> In membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() the compiler does not
> eliminate redundant branches and load of mm->membarrier_state
> for this case as th
On 2024-10-29 01:51, Nysal Jan K.A. wrote:
On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE
is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op.
In membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() the compiler does not
eliminate redundant branches and load of mm->membarrier_state
for this c
On architectures where ARCH_HAS_SYNC_CORE_BEFORE_USERMODE
is not selected, sync_core_before_usermode() is a no-op.
In membarrier_mm_sync_core_before_usermode() the compiler does not
eliminate redundant branches and load of mm->membarrier_state
for this case as the atomic_read() cannot be optimized
