>> Oh, I see. Should I send the patch again with the above change? If so
>> should I mark it v3 or just v2?
>
> Easier for benh/mpe if you do ;)
> Be sure to include my reviewed-by tag in your v3.
Sure. I will send v3.
On 2016/12/13 01:06PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Hi Naveen,
>
> >> Add modsw and moduw instruction emulation support to analyse_instr.
> >> modsw is an x-form instruction that calculates signed modulo of values
> >> stored in registers. moduw is similar to modsw but it works with
> >> un
Hi Naveen,
>> Add modsw and moduw instruction emulation support to analyse_instr.
>> modsw is an x-form instruction that calculates signed modulo of values
>> stored in registers. moduw is similar to modsw but it works with
>> unsigned values.
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> Don't update CR register as th
On 2016/12/07 11:15PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
> Add modsw and moduw instruction emulation support to analyse_instr.
> modsw is an x-form instruction that calculates signed modulo of values
> stored in registers. moduw is similar to modsw but it works with
> unsigned values.
>
> Changes
Add modsw and moduw instruction emulation support to analyse_instr.
modsw is an x-form instruction that calculates signed modulo of values
stored in registers. moduw is similar to modsw but it works with
unsigned values.
Changes in v2:
Don't update CR register as the instruction does not touch tha