It appears the discussion wrapped up on this, favorably. Is there
anything else I need to do to get this merged?
Regards,
PC
On 02/20/2015 11:18 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:13:33AM -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:
implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
(res
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:13:33AM -0600, Paul Clarke wrote:
>
> implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
>
> (resending because I messed up the e-mail addresses)
>
> Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for
> full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting
implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
(resending because I messed up the e-mail addresses)
Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for
full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to
implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() rout
implement arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() for powerpc
Commit 9b01f5bf3 introduced a dependency on "IRQ work self-IPIs" for
full dynamic ticks to be enabled, by expecting architectures to
implement a suitable arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() routine.
Several arches have implemented this routine, in
