On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> Anton> This is purposely. We also need support for 8610, and maybe
> Anton> later we'll find another chip with the same unit. So, to not touch
> Anton> the Kconfig for every new chip I just made it PPC32-wide. Other
> Anton> opt
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:46:49PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> You are correct we try to avoid this, but than I suggest we do it by
> family. I think its confusing to show 8610 and 8349 in the same dev
> tree.
I don't think it's confusing (at least, not moreso than picking an
arbitrary chip wi
> "Kumar" == Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Kumar> This way the compatiable binding in the code just lists something like
Kumar> "fsl,mpc8349-gpio", "fsl,mpc8610-gpio", "fsl,mpc8572-gpio".
Kumar> Does that make sense?
Yes, sounds fine - I'll adapt the patch and resend.
--
B
On Sep 19, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:02:11PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
Anton> This is purposely. We also need support for 8610, and maybe
Anton> later we'll find another chip with the same unit. So, to not
touch
Anton> the Kconfig for every new ch
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:02:11PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
>>> Anton> This is purposely. We also need support for 8610, and maybe
>>> Anton> later we'll find another chip with the same unit. So, to not
>>> touch
>>> Anton> the Kconfig for every new chip I just made it PPC32-wide.
>>> Oth
On Sep 19, 2008, at 10:33 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
"Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
It seems basically the same as my patch (gpio driver for
mpc831x/mpc834x/mpc837x with OF bindings) from September
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> It seems basically the same as my patch (gpio driver for
> >> mpc831x/mpc834x/mpc837x with OF bindings) from September 5th except
> >> you don't have a
> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> It seems basically the same as my patch (gpio driver for
>> mpc831x/mpc834x/mpc837x with OF bindings) from September 5th except
>> you don't have any documentation
Anton> Well, do we really need documentation for every trivi
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 09:30:16PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> > "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> Anton> This patch implements GPIOLIB support for MPC8349-compatible SOC
> GPIOs.
> Anton> MPC8610 adopted this GPIO unit, so let's place it into sysdev.
>
> "Anton" == Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
Anton> This patch implements GPIOLIB support for MPC8349-compatible SOC GPIOs.
Anton> MPC8610 adopted this GPIO unit, so let's place it into sysdev.
Anton> We'll need these gpios to support IrDA transceiver on MPC8610HPCD.
It s
This patch implements GPIOLIB support for MPC8349-compatible SOC GPIOs.
MPC8610 adopted this GPIO unit, so let's place it into sysdev.
We'll need these gpios to support IrDA transceiver on MPC8610HPCD.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
v2:
- Incorporated Peter Korsgaard's su
11 matches
Mail list logo