On Wed, 2019-08-28 at 15:54 +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Any plan to getting this applied soon ?
Hey Christophe,
I'm still working on it. Had to rework it for a few reasons, and it
exposed a bug somewhere else. Hope to have another version out soon.
- Russell
>
> Christophe
Any plan to getting this applied soon ?
Christophe
Le 14/06/2019 à 07:50, Russell Currey a écrit :
Strict module RWX is just like strict kernel RWX, but for modules - so
loadable modules aren't marked both writable and executable at the same
time. This is handled by the generic code in kernel/
Russell Currey writes:
> Strict module RWX is just like strict kernel RWX, but for modules - so
> loadable modules aren't marked both writable and executable at the same
> time. This is handled by the generic code in kernel/module.c, and
> simply requires the architecture to implement the set_me
Strict module RWX is just like strict kernel RWX, but for modules - so
loadable modules aren't marked both writable and executable at the same
time. This is handled by the generic code in kernel/module.c, and
simply requires the architecture to implement the set_memory() set of
functions, declared
