Thanks for looking into this patch Rob,
I have addressed your review comment in v3 of the patch posted at
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220531041446.3334259-1-vaib...@linux.ibm.com/
--
Cheers
~ Vaibhav
On Tue, May 24, 2022 at 11:20:42AM +0530, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
> in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
> ima-kexec-
Hi Ritesh,
thanks for looking into this patch,
Ritesh Harjani writes:
> Just a minor nit which I noticed.
>
> On 22/05/24 11:20AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
>> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
>> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This ca
Just a minor nit which I noticed.
On 22/05/24 11:20AM, Vaibhav Jain wrote:
> Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
> ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
> in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and
Presently ima_get_kexec_buffer() doesn't check if the previous kernel's
ima-kexec-buffer lies outside the addressable memory range. This can result
in a kernel panic if the new kernel is booted with 'mem=X' arg and the
ima-kexec-buffer was allocated beyond that range by the previous kernel.
The pan
