I'd still prefer to just kill it right away, but as the second best
option I'm ok with this:
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig
On 2024/9/5 7:33, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is rarely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap allocator for a long time.
>
>
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024 at 1:33 AM Yosry Ahmed wrote:
>
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is rarely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap allocator for a
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:33:43PM +, Yosry Ahmed wrote:
> The z3fold compressed pages allocator is rarely used, most users use
> zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
> dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
> the default zswap allocat
The z3fold compressed pages allocator is rarely used, most users use
zsmalloc. The only disadvantage of zsmalloc in comparison is the
dependency on MMU, and zbud is a more common option for !MMU as it was
the default zswap allocator for a long time.
Historically, zsmalloc had worse latency than zb
