Excerpts from Joe Perches's message of 2015-02-24 01:59:45 +1100:
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 11:55 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > 24 of the %.16llx
> > matches are in drivers/misc/cxl/, so internal consistency wins.
>
> I think that's more an argument for changing all of the
> cx1 uses to "%016ll
Acked-by: Ian Munsie
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 06:59 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 11:55 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > 24 of the %.16llx
> > matches are in drivers/misc/cxl/, so internal consistency wins.
>
> I think that's more an argument for changing all of the
> cx1 uses to "%016llx".
+1
che
On Mon, 2015-02-23 at 11:55 +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> 24 of the %.16llx
> matches are in drivers/misc/cxl/, so internal consistency wins.
I think that's more an argument for changing all of the
cx1 uses to "%016llx".
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing lis
C99 says that a precision given as simply '.' with no following digits
or * should be interpreted as 0. The kernel's printf implementation,
however, treats this case as if the precision was omitted. C99 also
says that if both the precision and value are 0, no digits should be
printed. Even if the k
