On Thu, 3 Sep 2009, Balbir Singh wrote:
> > Right, I'm proposing an alternate mapping scheme (which we've used for
> > years) for both platforms such that a cpu is bound (and is set in
> > cpumask_of_node()) to each fake node with which it has physical affinity.
> > That is the only way for zoneli
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:06 AM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
>> Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
>> a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
>>
>> # cat node0/cpulist
>>
>> # cat node1/cpulist
>
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
> Currently, the behavior of fake numa is not so on x86 as well? Below is
> a sample output from a single node x86 system booted with numa=fake=8:
>
> # cat node0/cpulist
>
> # cat node1/cpulist
>
> ...
> # cat node6/cpulist
>
> # cat node7/cpulist
> 0-7
Hi David,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2009 at 11:37:05PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
> > on ppc:
> >
> > 1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
> >
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009, Ankita Garg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
> on ppc:
>
> 1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
> boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
> different real node
Hi,
Below is a patch to fix a couple of issues with fake numa node creation
on ppc:
1) Presently, fake nodes could be created such that real numa node
boundaries are not respected. So a node could have lmbs that belong to
different real nodes.
2) The cpu association is broken. On a JS22 blade fo
