On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:06:55AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote:
> Sukadev Bhattiprolu [suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> | Arnaldo, Ingo,
> |
> | I added Andi's patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/28/521 to 'json-v16'
> branch.
> | and created a new branch, 'json-files-7' with updated to I
Em Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 11:06:55AM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu escreveu:
> Sukadev Bhattiprolu [suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
> | I added Andi's patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/28/521 to 'json-v16'
> branch.
> | and created a new branch, 'json-files-7' with updated to Intel data files.
> |
Sukadev Bhattiprolu [suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
| Arnaldo, Ingo,
|
| I added Andi's patch https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/28/521 to 'json-v16' branch.
| and created a new branch, 'json-files-7' with updated to Intel data files.
| Here are the three new branches.
|
| https://github.com:
Sukadev Bhattiprolu [suka...@linux.vnet.ibm.com] wrote:
| CPUs support a large number of performance monitoring events (PMU events)
| and often these events are very specific to an architecture/model of the
| CPU. To use most of these PMU events with perf, we currently have to identify
| them by th
CPUs support a large number of performance monitoring events (PMU events)
and often these events are very specific to an architecture/model of the
CPU. To use most of these PMU events with perf, we currently have to identify
them by their raw codes:
perf stat -e r100f2 sleep 1
This patchs
