On 08/15/2011 05:03 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
> more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> the flexcan implementations.
There are at
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> > property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
> > more specific answer
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt wrote:
> Grant,
>
> Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
> more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> the flexcan implementa
Grant,
Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
property of the Freescale flexcan device. I still have not gotten a
more specific answer. Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
the flexcan implementations.
Other than an agreement on the compatible property, I b
This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not used by the driver so we are removing them.
Signed-off-by: Robin Holt
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde ,
To: Wolfgang Grandegger ,
To: U Bhaskar-B223
