On 10/18/2017 08:14 PM, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> Thank you Andrey, I will test this patch. Should it go on top or replace the
> existing patch in mm-tree? ARM and x86 should be done the same either both as
> follow-ups or both replace.
>
It's a replacement of your patch.
> Pavel
>
> --
> To
Thank you Andrey, I will test this patch. Should it go on top or replace
the existing patch in mm-tree? ARM and x86 should be done the same
either both as follow-ups or both replace.
Pavel
During early boot, kasan uses vmemmap_populate() to establish its shadow
memory. But, that interface is intended for struct pages use.
Because of the current project, vmemmap won't be zeroed during allocation,
but kasan expects that memory to be zeroed. We are adding a new
kasan_map_populate() fun
