Sean Christopherson writes:
> arm64 folks, the first two patches are bug fixes, but I have very low
> confidence that they are correct and/or desirable. If they are more or
> less correct, I can post them separately if that'd make life easier. I
> included them here to avoid conflicts, and beca
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> An interesting evolution of the API could be to pass a struct kvm_follow_pfn
> pointer to {,__}kvm_faultin_pfn() and __gfn_to_page() (the "constructors");
> and on the other side to kvm_release_faultin_page() and
> kvm_release_page_*(). The struct kvm_f
On 7/27/24 01:51, Sean Christopherson wrote:
arm64 folks, the first two patches are bug fixes, but I have very low
confidence that they are correct and/or desirable. If they are more or
less correct, I can post them separately if that'd make life easier. I
included them here to avoid conflicts,
arm64 folks, the first two patches are bug fixes, but I have very low
confidence that they are correct and/or desirable. If they are more or
less correct, I can post them separately if that'd make life easier. I
included them here to avoid conflicts, and because I'm pretty sure how
KVM deals with
