Le 18/12/2018 à 18:04, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Stupid of me. In fact at the time being, BATS cover both RO and RW data
areas, so it can definitly not be mapped with PAGE_KERNEL_ROX.
In fact, as I have CONFIG_BDI_SWITCH in m
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Stupid of me. In fact at the time being, BATS cover both RO and RW data
> areas, so it can definitly not be mapped with PAGE_KERNEL_ROX.
>
> In fact, as I have CONFIG_BDI_SWITCH in my setup, PAGE_KERNEL_TEXT is
> PAGE_KERNEL_X on
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:55, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:15, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:07, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is see
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:15, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:07, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is seems
identical.
I know you tried already, but would yo
Le 18/12/2018 à 15:07, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is seems
identical.
I know you tried already, but would you mind trying once more with the
following change ?
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 09:18:42AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> The only difference I see then are the flags. Everything else is seems
> identical.
>
> I know you tried already, but would you mind trying once more with the
> following change ?
>
[...]
> - setbat(idx, PAGE_OFFSET +
On 12/18/2018 03:05 AM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
With patches 1-3:
[0.00] setbat(0, c000, , 0100, 311)
[0.00] setbat(2, c100, 0100, 0080, 311)
[0.00] setbat(4, d000, 100
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:29:18AM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > With patches 1-3:
> > [0.00] setbat(0, c000, , 0100, 311)
> > [0.00] setbat(2, c100, 0100, 0080, 311)
> > [0.00] setbat(4, d000, 1000, 0200, 791)
>
> What we see is
Le 17/12/2018 à 02:28, Jonathan Neuschäfer a écrit :
Hi, thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 03:51:32PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
Hi Again,
Le 13/12/2018 à 13:16, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
[...]
Can you tell/provide the .config and dts used ?
I'm using wii.dts and almos
Hi, thanks for your reply.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 03:51:32PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Hi Again,
>
> Le 13/12/2018 à 13:16, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
[...]
> > Can you tell/provide the .config and dts used ?
I'm using wii.dts and almost the wii_defconfig from my tree (save-
defconfig re
Hi Again,
Le 13/12/2018 à 13:16, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Hi,
On 12/03/2018 09:55 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 07:00:16PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
This patch reworks mmu_mapin_ram() to be more generic and map as much
blocks as possible. It now supports b
Hi,
On 12/03/2018 09:55 PM, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 07:00:16PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
This patch reworks mmu_mapin_ram() to be more generic and map as much
blocks as possible. It now supports blocks not starting at address 0.
It scans DBATs array to find
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 07:00:16PM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This patch reworks mmu_mapin_ram() to be more generic and map as much
> blocks as possible. It now supports blocks not starting at address 0.
>
> It scans DBATs array to find free ones instead of forcing the use of
> BAT2 and
This patch reworks mmu_mapin_ram() to be more generic and map as much
blocks as possible. It now supports blocks not starting at address 0.
It scans DBATs array to find free ones instead of forcing the use of
BAT2 and BAT3.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
arch/powerpc/mm/ppc_mmu_32.c | 61 +
14 matches
Mail list logo
