Thanks you all for the comments. Everything addressed, plus the array vs
pointer suggestion from Segher Boessenkool on the other thread, which
is only cosmetic and does not change anything wrt behaviour.
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 06:45:21PM +0100, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Subject line, change longjump to longjmp
>
> Le 27/03/2020 à 11:07, Clement Courbet a écrit :
> > Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> > non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has b
Subject line, change longjump to longjmp
Le 27/03/2020 à 11:07, Clement Courbet a écrit :
Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.
The implemen
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 10:10:44AM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:08 AM Clement Courbet wrote:
> >
> > Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> > non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
> > worked around by adding -ff
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 3:08 AM Clement Courbet wrote:
>
> Declaring setjmp()/longjmp() as taking longs makes the signature
> non-standard, and makes clang complain. In the past, this has been
> worked around by adding -ffreestanding to the compile flags.
>
> The implementation looks like it only
