On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le dimanche 18 mars 2012 à 12:56 -0400, Paul Gortmaker a écrit :
>> The BQL support here is unchanged from what I posted earlier as an
>> RFC[1] -- with the exception of the fact that I'm now happier with
>> the runtime testing vs. the simple
Le dimanche 18 mars 2012 à 12:56 -0400, Paul Gortmaker a écrit :
> The BQL support here is unchanged from what I posted earlier as an
> RFC[1] -- with the exception of the fact that I'm now happier with
> the runtime testing vs. the simple "hey it boots" that I'd done
> for the RFC. Plus I added a
The BQL support here is unchanged from what I posted earlier as an
RFC[1] -- with the exception of the fact that I'm now happier with
the runtime testing vs. the simple "hey it boots" that I'd done
for the RFC. Plus I added a couple trivial cleanup patches.
For testing, I made a couple spiders ho
