On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:45 AM 'Liam R. Howlett' via kernel-team
wrote:
>
> * Lorenzo Stoakes [241213 10:16]:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:06:55AM -0500, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:00 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > > wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > >
> > > On the technical side, Liam i
* Lorenzo Stoakes [241213 10:16]:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:06:55AM -0500, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:00 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> > wrote:
...
> >
> > On the technical side, Liam is right that the copy-pasted arch code
> > has inconsistencies (missing checks, order of chec
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 10:06:55AM -0500, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:00 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:36:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:51:34 + Lorenzo Stoakes
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > You've fundamentally
On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 4:00 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:36:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:51:34 + Lorenzo Stoakes
> > wrote:
> >
> > > You've fundamentally violated kernel process and etiquette. I'd be more
> > > forgiving, but this
On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 05:36:09PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:51:34 + Lorenzo Stoakes
> wrote:
>
> > You've fundamentally violated kernel process and etiquette. I'd be more
> > forgiving, but this is at v2 and you've not cc'd KEY people. Twice. This is
> > totally un
On Thu, 12 Dec 2024 22:51:34 + Lorenzo Stoakes
wrote:
> You've fundamentally violated kernel process and etiquette. I'd be more
> forgiving, but this is at v2 and you've not cc'd KEY people. Twice. This is
> totally unacceptable. See [0] if you are unsure of how to do so.
This feels excessi
NACK.
Resend this _as an RFC_, _with the correct maintainers and reviewers cc'd_.
You've fundamentally violated kernel process and etiquette. I'd be more
forgiving, but this is at v2 and you've not cc'd KEY people. Twice. This is
totally unacceptable. See [0] if you are unsure of how to do so.
Y
On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 03:27:38PM -0800, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is v2 othe the arch_mmap_hint() series.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - MAP_FIXED case is also handled in arch_mmap_hint() since this is just a
> special case of the hint addr being "enforced", per Yang Shi.
> - Conso
+ Lorenzo
Can you please Cc the people listed in the maintainers on the files you
are submitting against? You seemed to Cc everyone but the mmap.c file
maintainers?
* Kalesh Singh [241211 18:28]:
> Hi all,
>
> This is v2 othe the arch_mmap_hint() series.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - MAP_FIXED
Hi all,
This is v2 othe the arch_mmap_hint() series.
Changes in v2:
- MAP_FIXED case is also handled in arch_mmap_hint() since this is just a
special case of the hint addr being "enforced", per Yang Shi.
- Consolidate most of the error handling in arch_mmap_hint().
- Patch 16 ("mm: Fall
10 matches
Mail list logo