On Sat, May 7, 2022 at 9:04 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
> Le 02/05/2022 à 15:24, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> > CGEL writes:
> >> From: Jing Yangyang
> >>
> >> Use BUG_ON instead of a if condition followed by BUG.
> >>
> >> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:21:2-5:WARNING
> >> Use BUG_
Le 02/05/2022 à 15:24, Michael Ellerman a écrit :
> CGEL writes:
>> From: Jing Yangyang
>>
>> Use BUG_ON instead of a if condition followed by BUG.
>>
>> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:21:2-5:WARNING
>> Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
>> ./arch/powerpc/include/
CGEL writes:
> From: Jing Yangyang
>
> Use BUG_ON instead of a if condition followed by BUG.
>
> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:21:2-5:WARNING
> Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
> ./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:14:2-5:WARNING
> Use BUG_ON instead of
Hi Jing,
Thanks for your patch.
The patch looks good, but looking at the output of `make coccicheck
M=arch/powerpc MODE=report`, it looks like there might be a few other
things that we might want to fix. Would it be worth trying to make the
arch/powerpc directory free from coccinelle warnings in
From: Jing Yangyang
Use BUG_ON instead of a if condition followed by BUG.
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:21:2-5:WARNING
Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
./arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/pkeys.h:14:2-5:WARNING
Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG
