On 9/6/23 01:56, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2023, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>> As Kirill pointed out, mapping can be removed under us due to
>> truncation. Test it under folio lock as already done for the async
>> compaction / dirty folio case. To prevent locking every folio with
>>
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> As Kirill pointed out, mapping can be removed under us due to
> truncation. Test it under folio lock as already done for the async
> compaction / dirty folio case. To prevent locking every folio with
> mapping to do the test, do it only for unevictable
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> As Kirill pointed out, mapping can be removed under us due to
> truncation. Test it under folio lock as already done for the async
> compaction / dirty folio case. To prevent locking every folio with
> mapping to do the test, do it
On Fri, Sep 01, 2023 at 10:20:26AM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> As Kirill pointed out, mapping can be removed under us due to
> truncation. Test it under folio lock as already done for the async
> compaction / dirty folio case. To prevent locking every folio with
> mapping to do the test, do it
As Kirill pointed out, mapping can be removed under us due to
truncation. Test it under folio lock as already done for the async
compaction / dirty folio case. To prevent locking every folio with
mapping to do the test, do it only for unevictable folios, as we can
expect the unmovable mapping folio
