On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 09:39, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
>
> Currently, __xlated_unpriv and __jited_unpriv do not work because the
> BPF syscall will overwrite info.jited_prog_len and info.xlated_prog_len
> with 0 if the process is not bpf_capable(). This bug was not noticed
> before, because there is no
On Thu, 2025-05-01 at 09:35 +0200, Luis Gerhorst wrote:
> Currently, __xlated_unpriv and __jited_unpriv do not work because the
> BPF syscall will overwrite info.jited_prog_len and info.xlated_prog_len
> with 0 if the process is not bpf_capable(). This bug was not noticed
> before, because there is
Currently, __xlated_unpriv and __jited_unpriv do not work because the
BPF syscall will overwrite info.jited_prog_len and info.xlated_prog_len
with 0 if the process is not bpf_capable(). This bug was not noticed
before, because there is no test that actually uses
__xlated_unpriv/__jited_unpriv.
To
