On 12/03/2018 02:26 PM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 03/12/18 6:18 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, just to clarify, it's targeted at bpf-next and
>> not bpf, correct?
>
> This patch is targeted at the bpf tree.
Ok, thanks for clarifying, applied to bpf!
Hi Daniel,
On 03/12/18 6:18 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>
> Thanks for the patch, just to clarify, it's targeted at bpf-next and
> not bpf, correct?
>
This patch is targeted at the bpf tree.
This depends on commit e2c95a61656d ("bpf, ppc64: generalize fetching
subprog into bpf_jit_get_func_addr
Hi Sandipan,
On 12/03/2018 01:21 PM, Sandipan Das wrote:
> Once the JITed images for each function in a multi-function program
> are generated after the first three JIT passes, we only need to fix
> the target address for the branch instruction corresponding to each
> bpf-to-bpf function call.
>
Once the JITed images for each function in a multi-function program
are generated after the first three JIT passes, we only need to fix
the target address for the branch instruction corresponding to each
bpf-to-bpf function call.
This introduces the following optimizations for reducing the work
do
