On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:11:24PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
>On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:51:15AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:32:33PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>>The subject says "Trace first 7 BARs..." I think maybe you meant "Track
>>>first 7 BARs" or maybe "Cache only B
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:51:15AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:32:33PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>The subject says "Trace first 7 BARs..." I think maybe you meant "Track
>>first 7 BARs" or maybe "Cache only BARs, not windows or IOV BARs"
>>
>
>Agree, Track is more accurat
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 06:32:33PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>The subject says "Trace first 7 BARs..." I think maybe you meant "Track
>first 7 BARs" or maybe "Cache only BARs, not windows or IOV BARs"
>
Agree, Track is more accurate.
Gavin,
Which subject you prefer?
>On Tue, May 19, 2015 at
The subject says "Trace first 7 BARs..." I think maybe you meant "Track
first 7 BARs" or maybe "Cache only BARs, not windows or IOV BARs"
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 06:50:06PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
> EEH address cache, which helps to locate the PCI device according to
> the given (physical) MMIO ad
EEH address cache, which helps to locate the PCI device according to
the given (physical) MMIO address, didn't cover PCI bridges. Also, it
shouldn't return PF with address in PF's IOV BARs. Instead, the VFs
should be returned.
The patch restricts the address cache to cover first 7 BARs for the
abo
