On 18/07/16 18:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 18/07/2016 09:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> On 07/15/2016 09:52 AM, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> On 14/07/16 19:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 13/07/2016 20:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> I thought u64 still existed on 32-b
On 18/07/2016 09:17, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 07/15/2016 09:52 AM, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 14/07/16 19:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13/07/2016 20:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
I thought u64 still existed on 32-bit architectures. unsigned long
w
On 07/15/2016 09:52 AM, Suraj Jitindar Singh wrote:
>
>
> On 14/07/16 19:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 13/07/2016 20:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> I thought u64 still existed on 32-bit architectures. unsigned long
>>> would be fine but with the caveat that certain stats would o
On 14/07/16 19:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 13/07/2016 20:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>> I thought u64 still existed on 32-bit architectures. unsigned long
>> would be fine but with the caveat that certain stats would overflow on
>> 32-bit architectures.
Yes, but not all
On 13/07/2016 20:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>>> >> I thought u64 still existed on 32-bit architectures. unsigned long
>>> >> would be fine but with the caveat that certain stats would overflow on
>>> >> 32-bit architectures.
>> >
>> > Yes, but not all 32-bit architectures can do atomic rea
On 07/11/2016 09:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 19:30, David Matlack wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
>> vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
>> deb
On 12/07/16 05:45, David Matlack wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 19:30, David Matlack wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
>>> vcpus have statistics associate
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 19:30, David Matlack wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
>> vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
>
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
>>> > vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
>>> > debugfs. Currently it is assumed within the vcpu_stat_get() and
>>> > vcpu_stat_get_per_vm() functions that a
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Suraj Jitindar Singh
wrote:
> vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
> debugfs. Currently it is assumed within the vcpu_stat_get() and
> vcpu_stat_get_per_vm() functions that all of these statistics are
> represented as 32-bit nu
On 11/07/2016 19:30, David Matlack wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
> vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
> debugfs. Currently it is assumed within the vcpu_stat_get()
On 11/07/2016 18:51, David Matlack wrote:
>> > vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
>> > debugfs. Currently it is assumed within the vcpu_stat_get() and
>> > vcpu_stat_get_per_vm() functions that all of these statistics are
>> > represented as 32-bit numbers.
vcpus have statistics associated with them which can be viewed within the
debugfs. Currently it is assumed within the vcpu_stat_get() and
vcpu_stat_get_per_vm() functions that all of these statistics are
represented as 32-bit numbers. The next patch adds some 64-bit statistics,
so add provisioning
13 matches
Mail list logo
