On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 11:46 PM, Benjamin
Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 00:07 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> From: Grant Likely
>>
>> The two versions are doing almost exactly the same thing. No need to
>> maintain them as separate files. This patch also has the side effect
>> of
On Wed, 2009-08-26 at 00:07 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> From: Grant Likely
>
> The two versions are doing almost exactly the same thing. No need to
> maintain them as separate files. This patch also has the side effect
> of making the PCI device tree scanning code available to 32 bit powerpc
>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>
> On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> +/**
>> + * pci_scan_phb - Given a pci_controller, setup and scan the PCI bus
>> + * @hose: Pointer to the PCI host controller instance structure
>> + * @data: value to use for sysdata point
On Aug 26, 2009, at 1:07 AM, Grant Likely wrote:
+/**
+ * pci_scan_phb - Given a pci_controller, setup and scan the PCI bus
+ * @hose: Pointer to the PCI host controller instance structure
+ * @data: value to use for sysdata pointer. ppc32 and ppc64 differ
here
+ *
+ * Note: the 'data' poin
From: Grant Likely
The two versions are doing almost exactly the same thing. No need to
maintain them as separate files. This patch also has the side effect
of making the PCI device tree scanning code available to 32 bit powerpc
machines, but no board ports actually make use of this feature at
