Nicholas Piggin writes:
> I had a series which goes significantly further with stack reduction. What
> do you think about just going with that?
I am yet to review that. What I did here is minimum that is required to
get 4PB series compiled.
>
> I wonder if we should switch to dynamically alloc
I had a series which goes significantly further with stack reduction. What
do you think about just going with that?
I wonder if we should switch to dynamically allocating the slice stuff on
ppc64
On 27 Feb. 2018 00:28, "Aneesh Kumar K.V"
wrote:
> This patch kill potential_mask and compat_mask v
This patch kill potential_mask and compat_mask variable and instead use tmp_mask
so that we can reduce the stack usage. This is required so that we can increase
the high_slices bitmap to a larger value.
The patch does result in extra computation in final stage, where it ends up
recomputing the com
