On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 10:44:33AM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> > >> Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
> > >> remove direct
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> >> Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
> >> remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
> >> source file format.
> >
> >
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:29 PM, David Gibson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
>> Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
>> remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
>> source file format.
>
> Um.. why? I ju
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:02:43PM -0500, Jon Loeliger wrote:
> Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
> remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
> source file format.
Um.. why? I just don't see a compelling reason to remove this
backwards compatibility. It cost
Now that all in-kernel-tree DTS files are properly /dts-v1/,
remove direct support for the older, un-numbered DTS
source file format.
Convert existing tests to /dts-v1/ and remove support
for the conversion tests themselves.
For now, though, the conversion tool still exists.
Signed-off-by: Jon L
