Le 13/09/2021 à 21:11, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy writes:
Le 13/09/2021 à 18:21, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
Christophe Leroy writes:
Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
within the user access bl
Christophe Leroy writes:
> Le 13/09/2021 à 18:21, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
>> ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
>>
>>> Christophe Leroy writes:
>>>
Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
within the user access block.
On an mpc 8321 (book3
Le 13/09/2021 à 18:21, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
Christophe Leroy writes:
Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
within the user access block.
On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process
sending
Le 13/09/2021 à 17:57, Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
Christophe Leroy writes:
Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
within the user access block.
On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process
sending a signal to itself.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Lero
ebied...@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes:
> Christophe Leroy writes:
>
>> Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
>> within the user access block.
>>
>> On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process
>> sending a signal to itself.
If you can't make f
Christophe Leroy writes:
> Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
> within the user access block.
>
> On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process
> sending a signal to itself.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
> ---
> v3: Don't leave compat aside, use
Use unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user() in order to do the copy
within the user access block.
On an mpc 8321 (book3s/32) the improvment is about 5% on a process
sending a signal to itself.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
v3: Don't leave compat aside, use the new unsafe_copy_siginfo_to_user32()
---
