On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 09:12 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Oops... forgot those. Applied, will show up in -next soon.
>
> Ah, thanks. I also asked Ben Dooks to pick them up, but better twice
> than never
> ;)
Ok, Ben, are you taking them or do you want me to ?
Cheers,
Ben.
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 05:06:14PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 02:17 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
> > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
> > only used on powerpc,
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 02:17 +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
> only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
Oops... forgot those. Applied, will show up in -next
On Fri, 2 Apr 2010 02:17:01 +0200
Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
> (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the
> driver is only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
> Acked-by: Grant
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is
only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow.
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang
Acked-by: Grant Likely
Cc: Sean MacLennan
Cc: Ben Dooks
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2
