Re: [PATCH RESEND 2/3] i2c/cpm: drop NO_IRQ

2010-04-02 Thread Jochen Friedrich
Wolfram Sang wrote: Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq' Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Grant Likely Acked-by: Jochen Friedrich Thanks, Jochen ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://list

[PATCH RESEND 2/3] i2c/cpm: drop NO_IRQ

2010-04-01 Thread Wolfram Sang
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq' (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Grant Likely Cc: Jochen Friedrich Cc: Ben Dooks --- drivers/i2c/busses/