Re: [PATCH 8/8] ibm_newemac: Skip EMACs that are marked unused by the firmware

2007-11-20 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 08:13 +0100, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > From: Hugh Blemings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Depending on how the 44x processors are wired, some EMAC cells > > might not be useable (and not connected to a PHY). However, s

Re: [PATCH 8/8] ibm_newemac: Skip EMACs that are marked unused by the firmware

2007-11-20 Thread Stefan Roese
On Wednesday 21 November 2007, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > From: Hugh Blemings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Depending on how the 44x processors are wired, some EMAC cells > might not be useable (and not connected to a PHY). However, some > device-trees may choose to still expose them (since their re

[PATCH 8/8] ibm_newemac: Skip EMACs that are marked unused by the firmware

2007-11-20 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
From: Hugh Blemings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Depending on how the 44x processors are wired, some EMAC cells might not be useable (and not connected to a PHY). However, some device-trees may choose to still expose them (since their registers are present in the MMIO space) but with an "unused" property i