17, 2007 7:20 AM
> To: Stephen Neuendorffer
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Gibson
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] [POWERPC] Xilinx: Update booting-without-of.
>
> > - (name)@(base-address) {
> > + (name): (ip-core-
On 12/17/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> When the driver no longer requires the port number, it's easy to drop.
> Until then, I'll keep it in.
>
> Also, I'm not so sure that moving to completely generic names is really
> worth the effort... All the 'semantically' interestin
s morning, so productivity may
be low. :)
Steve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Grant Likely
Sent: Mon 12/17/2007 7:19 AM
To: Stephen Neuendorffer
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org; David Gibson
Subject: Re: [PATC
On 12/17/07, Peter Korsgaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> >> > 3) Uartlite requires a port-number property for the console to work.
> >>
> >> Why? In general we try to avoid magical sequence numbers - cell-index
> >> should
On 12/13/07, Stephen Neuendorffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This now better describes what the UBoot device tree generator actually does.
> In particular:
>
> 1) Nodes have a label derived from the device name, and a node name
> derived from the device type.
> 2) Usage of compound nodes (repre
> "Grant" == Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi,
>> > 3) Uartlite requires a port-number property for the console to work.
>>
>> Why? In general we try to avoid magical sequence numbers - cell-index
>> should *only* be used when it's needed to index or program some shared
>> r
27;t be handled by a common
'pseudo-bus'.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Grant Likely
Sent: Sun 12/16/2007 8:30 PM
To: Stephen Neuendorffer; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
PROTECTED]; linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7]
On 12/16/07, David Gibson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:43:33PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> > This now better describes what the UBoot device tree generator actually
> > does. In particular:
> >
> > 1) Nodes have a label derived from the device name, and a node
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 03:43:33PM -0800, Stephen Neuendorffer wrote:
> This now better describes what the UBoot device tree generator actually does.
> In particular:
>
> 1) Nodes have a label derived from the device name, and a node name
> derived from the device type.
> 2) Usage of compound no
This now better describes what the UBoot device tree generator actually does.
In particular:
1) Nodes have a label derived from the device name, and a node name
derived from the device type.
2) Usage of compound nodes (representing more than one device in the same IP)
which actually works. Thi
10 matches
Mail list logo
