On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:27 PM Wolfram Sang
wrote:
> Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
> needed. For the others m
On 3/22/24 3:25 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
needed. For the others more work needs to be
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:25:57PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
> needed. For the
> Kind of odd though to change function names but not parameter names of
> those very same functions.
Ouch, this is definitely a valid point. Seems like this series will need
a respin after all. Will wait for further comments, though.
Thanks!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 22/03/2024 at 14:25, Wolfram Sang wrote:
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
content is safe
Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
appropriate terms.
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:47 AM Wolfram Sang
wrote:
>
>
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre # for at91
> > Probably file names themselves will need some care, in a second time.
>
> Totally true. I am aware of that. But one step after the other...
>
Kind of odd though to change function names but not par
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre # for at91
> Probably file names themselves will need some care, in a second time.
Totally true. I am aware of that. But one step after the other...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:25:57PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
> needed. For the
Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
needed. For the others more work needs to be done but this will be
performed increment
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 05:48:54PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
> > > static const struct i2c_algorithm at91_twi_algorithm = {
> > > - .master_xfer= at91_twi_xfer,
> > > + .xfer = at91_twi_xfer,
> >
> > Seems you made this by a script, can you check the indentations afterwards?
>
> Yes, I
> > static const struct i2c_algorithm at91_twi_algorithm = {
> > - .master_xfer= at91_twi_xfer,
> > + .xfer = at91_twi_xfer,
>
> Seems you made this by a script, can you check the indentations afterwards?
Yes, I noticed as well. But other (not converted) drivers have issues
there as w
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 02:25:57PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Match the wording in i2c_algorithm in I2C drivers wrt. the newest I2C
> v7, SMBus 3.2, I3C specifications and replace "master/slave" with more
> appropriate terms. For some drivers, this means no more conversions are
> needed. For the
12 matches
Mail list logo
