Dave Hansen writes:
> I'm debating whether this is worth it. It makes this a bit more clean
> looking, but doesn't seriously enhance readability. But, I do think
> it helps a bit.
I get this when compiling a pseries config (with the patches up to
this point applied but not 7/8 or 8/8):
CC
Quoting Dave Hansen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> I'm debating whether this is worth it. It makes this a bit more clean
> looking, but doesn't seriously enhance readability. But, I do think
> it helps a bit.
>
> Thoughts?
Absolutely. do_init_bootmem_node() is *still* a bit largish,
but far better b
I'm debating whether this is worth it. It makes this a bit more clean
looking, but doesn't seriously enhance readability. But, I do think
it helps a bit.
Thoughts?
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
linux-2.6.git-dave/arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c | 104 +++--
