On 3/4/2016 3:55 PM, Uma Krishnan wrote:
From: "Manoj N. Kumar"
When switching to the internal LUN defined on the
IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary
scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads
to the following extra lines in the log:
Dec 17 10:09:00 tul83p1 kernel: [ 3708.56
> On Mar 4, 2016, at 3:55 PM, Uma Krishnan wrote:
>
> From: "Manoj N. Kumar"
>
> When switching to the internal LUN defined on the
> IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary
> scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads
> to the following extra lines in the log:
>
> Dec 17 10:09:0
From: "Manoj N. Kumar"
When switching to the internal LUN defined on the
IBM CXL flash adapter, there is an unnecessary
scan occurring on the second port. This scan leads
to the following extra lines in the log:
Dec 17 10:09:00 tul83p1 kernel: [ 3708.561134] cxlflash 0008:00:00.0:
cxlflash_queu
