On Tue, 2021-11-16 at 18:43 +, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021, David Woodhouse wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse
> >
> > It's all fairly baroque but in the end, I don't think there's any reason
> > for $(KVM)/irqchip.o to have been handled differently, as they all end
> > up
From: David Woodhouse
It's all fairly baroque but in the end, I don't think there's any reason
for $(KVM)/irqchip.o to have been handled differently, as they all end
up in $(kvm-y) in the end anyway, regardless of whether they get there
via $(common-objs-y) and the CPU-specific object lists.
The
