Ben,
On 19.05.2011 [10:46:25 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 19.05.2011 [17:43:56 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:25 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > From: Milton Miller
> > >
> > > The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the mask re
On 19.05.2011 [17:43:56 +1000], Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:25 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > From: Milton Miller
> >
> > The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the mask required
> > by the platform to operate efficently. The generic version of
>
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:25 -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> From: Milton Miller
>
> The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the mask required
> by the platform to operate efficently. The generic version of
> dma_get_required_mask in driver/base/platform.c returns a mask based
>
From: Milton Miller
The hook dma_get_required_mask is supposed to return the mask required
by the platform to operate efficently. The generic version of
dma_get_required_mask in driver/base/platform.c returns a mask based
only on max_pfn. However, this is likely too big for iommu systems
and co