subject:"\[PATCH 5\/5\] powerpc\/mm\: Drop CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K"

Re: [PATCH 5/5] powerpc/mm: Drop CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K

2015-08-09 Thread Aneesh Kumar K.V

Michael Ellerman writes: > The relation between CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K and CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES is > painfully complicated. > > But if we rearrange it enough we can see that PPC_HAS_HASH_64K > essentially depends on PPC_STD_MMU_64 && PPC_64K_PAGES. > > We can then notice that PPC_HAS_HASH_64K is

[PATCH 5/5] powerpc/mm: Drop CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K

2015-08-06 Thread Michael Ellerman

The relation between CONFIG_PPC_HAS_HASH_64K and CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES is painfully complicated. But if we rearrange it enough we can see that PPC_HAS_HASH_64K essentially depends on PPC_STD_MMU_64 && PPC_64K_PAGES. We can then notice that PPC_HAS_HASH_64K is used in files that are only built for