On Jul 19, 2007, at 4:10 PM, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:44:57 +0200
> Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> MPC83xx based machines don't need their own kernel,
>> but can run one that is shared with the other 6xx
>> compatible machines, so we should allow that
>> in Kcon
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:44:57 +0200
Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MPC83xx based machines don't need their own kernel,
> but can run one that is shared with the other 6xx
> compatible machines, so we should allow that
> in Kconfig.
>
> Cc: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Signed-off-by
Jon Loeliger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX183KEAUKHXvruCYhaaV52OzolDzOwR8U/cVbZz
RqqlZgNmQVzTnk6PKfA2exuU2PW9QK2JcOV9grQhnden9S/eQ3
4u2xKjwqyFO/YMrW3bvyA==
> Hmmm... Shouldn't this sort of change come
> with an update to the 8641 defconfig too?
Content-Disposition: inline
MPC83xx based machines don't need their own kernel,
but can run one that is shared with the other 6xx
compatible machines, so we should allow that
in Kconfig.
Cc: Kumar Gala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Index: linux-2.6/arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Kconfi