On Mon, Feb 03, 2020 at 07:35:19PM +1100, Oliver O'Halloran wrote:
> This check for a missing PHB has existing in various forms since the
> initial PPC64 port was upstreamed in 2002. The idea seems to be that we
> need to guard against creating pci-specific data structures for the non-pci
> childre
This check for a missing PHB has existing in various forms since the
initial PPC64 port was upstreamed in 2002. The idea seems to be that we
need to guard against creating pci-specific data structures for the non-pci
children of a PCI device tree node (e.g. USB devices). However, we only
create pci
