Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-08-03 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:38:25 +0200 Stefan Roese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +static void ibm440epx_fixup_memsize(void) > > > > And we should move this at the same time. Isn't denali used by another > > CPU as well? > > Right now the Denali DDR(2) core is only used by the 440EPx/440GRx. But o

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-08-02 Thread Stefan Roese
On Thursday 02 August 2007, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:14:45 +0400 > > +#define SPRN_CCR1 0x378 > > +void ibm440ep_fixup_clocks(unsigned int sysclk, unsigned int ser_clk) > > +{ > > + u32 cpu, plb, opb, ebc, tb, uart0, m, vco; > > + u32 reg; > > + u32 fwdva, fwdvb, fbdv, lfbdv

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-08-02 Thread Josh Boyer
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 19:14:45 +0400 > +#define SPRN_CCR1 0x378 > +void ibm440ep_fixup_clocks(unsigned int sysclk, unsigned int ser_clk) > +{ > + u32 cpu, plb, opb, ebc, tb, uart0, m, vco; > + u32 reg; > + u32 fwdva, fwdvb, fbdv, lfbdv, opbdv0, perdv0, spcid0, prbdv0, tmp; > + > + mtd

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-31 Thread David Gibson
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:42:46PM +0200, Stefan Roese wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > > Is treeboot-* really needed on Sequoia? From my understanding this is > > > only needed for platforms using OpenBIOS as bootloader. > > > > Right, it's not used for u-boot. I've i

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-31 Thread Valentine Barshak
Stefan Roese wrote: > On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote: >>> Is treeboot-* really needed on Sequoia? From my understanding this is >>> only needed for platforms using OpenBIOS as bootloader. >> Right, it's not used for u-boot. I've included it just in case. > > I think we should dro

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-31 Thread Stefan Roese
On Tuesday 31 July 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote: > > Is treeboot-* really needed on Sequoia? From my understanding this is > > only needed for platforms using OpenBIOS as bootloader. > > Right, it's not used for u-boot. I've included it just in case. I think we should drop it, when it's not used

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-31 Thread Valentine Barshak
Stefan Roese wrote: > On Monday 30 July 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote: >> A bootwrapper code for Sequoia. >> >> Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/boot/44x.h |1 >> arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |6 >> arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-se

Re: [PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-30 Thread Stefan Roese
On Monday 30 July 2007, Valentine Barshak wrote: > A bootwrapper code for Sequoia. > > Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --- > arch/powerpc/boot/44x.h |1 > arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |6 > arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-sequoia.c | 31 > arch

[PATCH 4/6] PowerPC 440EPx: Sequoia bootwrapper

2007-07-30 Thread Valentine Barshak
A bootwrapper code for Sequoia. Signed-off-by: Valentine Barshak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- arch/powerpc/boot/44x.h |1 arch/powerpc/boot/Makefile |6 arch/powerpc/boot/cuboot-sequoia.c | 31 arch/powerpc/boot/sequoia.c | 234 ++