Instead of rejecting devices with a too small bus_dma_mask we can handle
by taking the bus dma_mask into account for allocations and bounce
buffering decisions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/linux/dma-direct.h | 3 ++-
kernel/dma/direct.c| 21 +++--
2 file
On 27/09/18 17:27, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:14:56PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
This just seemed more readable to me than min_not_zero, but if others
prefer min_not_zero I can switch.
Nah, just checking whether there were any intentionally different
assumptions compar
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:14:56PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> This just seemed more readable to me than min_not_zero, but if others
>> prefer min_not_zero I can switch.
>
> Nah, just checking whether there were any intentionally different
> assumptions compared to the couple of other places in
On 27/09/18 16:32, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:58:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
}
#endif /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA */
diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
index 3c404e33d946..64466b7ef67b 100644
--- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
+++ b/kernel/dma
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 03:58:04PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> }
>> #endif /* !CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PHYS_TO_DMA */
>> diff --git a/kernel/dma/direct.c b/kernel/dma/direct.c
>> index 3c404e33d946..64466b7ef67b 100644
>> --- a/kernel/dma/direct.c
>> +++ b/kernel/dma/direct.c
>> @@ -43,10 +43,11 @@
On 20/09/18 19:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Instead of rejecting devices with a too small bus_dma_mask we can handle
by taking the bus dma_mask into account for allocations and bounce
buffering decisions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/linux/dma-direct.h | 3 ++-
kernel/dma/di
Instead of rejecting devices with a too small bus_dma_mask we can handle
by taking the bus dma_mask into account for allocations and bounce
buffering decisions.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
---
include/linux/dma-direct.h | 3 ++-
kernel/dma/direct.c| 21 +++--
2 file
