On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:56:44PM +0200, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> Current standard practice is not to represent the DCR bus as node with
>> subnodes for the DCR-controlled devices. That's because the DCR bus
>> tends to run in addition to other on-chip busses, and some things have
>> to go on
Current standard practice is not to represent the DCR bus as node with
subnodes for the DCR-controlled devices. That's because the DCR bus
tends to run in addition to other on-chip busses, and some things have
to go on another on-chip bus to make sense, but still have DCR control
registers (for e
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 10:55:53PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This device contains a dcr interface. Previously, the dcr interface
> > was assumed to be used in mmio mode, and the register space of the dcr
> >
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 11:56 AM, Stephen Neuendorffer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This device contains a dcr interface. Previously, the dcr interface
> was assumed to be used in mmio mode, and the register space of the dcr
> interface was precomputed and stuffed in the device tree. This patch
This device contains a dcr interface. Previously, the dcr interface
was assumed to be used in mmio mode, and the register space of the dcr
interface was precomputed and stuffed in the device tree. This patch
makes use of the new dcr infrastructure to represent the dcr interface
as any other dcr i
