On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 15:44 -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> I am planning on pulling the first two patches and sending them out
> separate from the patch set since they are really independent of the
> rest of the patch series.
>
> The remaining code I will send out for review and inclusion in
> li
On 08/04/2013 10:13 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:13:06PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> On 08/01/2013 09:32 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:37:47PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
When doing memory hot add via the 'probe' interface in sysf
On Fri, Aug 02, 2013 at 02:13:06PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 08/01/2013 09:32 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:37:47PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> >> When doing memory hot add via the 'probe' interface in sysfs we do not
> >> need to loop through and add memor
On 08/01/2013 09:32 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:37:47PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
>> When doing memory hot add via the 'probe' interface in sysfs we do not
>> need to loop through and add memory one section at a time. I think this
>> was originally done for powerpc,
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 01:37:47PM -0500, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> When doing memory hot add via the 'probe' interface in sysfs we do not
> need to loop through and add memory one section at a time. I think this
> was originally done for powerpc, but is not needed. This patch removes
> the loop and
When doing memory hot add via the 'probe' interface in sysfs we do not
need to loop through and add memory one section at a time. I think this
was originally done for powerpc, but is not needed. This patch removes
the loop and just calls add_memory for all of the memory to be added.
Signed-off-by:
