On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:58:13PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> We need to call exit_thread from copy_process in a fail path. So make
> it accept task_struct as a parameter.
Hmm, so what this means is that exit_thread() can now be called for
threads which are not running on the CPU. So, I think th
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:58:13PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> void
> -exit_thread(void)
> +exit_thread(struct task_struct *me)
> {
> }
task_struct arguments are called: tsk, task, p
'me' seems very wrong, as that could only mean 'current', and its
clearly not that.
_
On 03/24/2016, 02:03 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 01:58:13PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> void
>> -exit_thread(void)
>> +exit_thread(struct task_struct *me)
>> {
>> }
>
> task_struct arguments are called: tsk, task, p
> 'me' seems very wrong, as that could only mean 'curre
We need to call exit_thread from copy_process in a fail path. So make
it accept task_struct as a parameter.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby
Cc: Richard Henderson
Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky
Cc: Matt Turner
Cc: Vineet Gupta
Cc: Russell King
Cc: Catalin Marinas
Cc: Will Deacon
Cc: Haavard Skinnemoen
Cc:
