Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:50 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > Hi Ingo, > > > Just to confirm - these 3 symbol fixes are for the PowerPC tree, not for > > the perf events tree, right? There's nothing perf specific about the > > fixes - kgdb, systemtap and other debugging/instrumentation frameworks

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Ingo, > Just to confirm - these 3 symbol fixes are for the PowerPC tree, not for > the perf events tree, right? There's nothing perf specific about the > fixes - kgdb, systemtap and other debugging/instrumentation frameworks > will benefit from more precise symbol generation too. Yeah, wh

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Anton Blanchard wrote: > If CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES isn't defined we end up with iseries_check_pending_irqs > and do_work at the same address. perf ends up picking > iseries_check_pending_irqs which creates confusing backtraces. Hide it. > > Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard Just to confirm - these

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-18 Thread Anton Blanchard
If CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES isn't defined we end up with iseries_check_pending_irqs and do_work at the same address. perf ends up picking iseries_check_pending_irqs which creates confusing backtraces. Hide it. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard -- Index: linux.trees.git/arch/powerpc/kernel/entry_64.S ===