Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: Dont require a dma_ops struct to set dma mask

2011-06-22 Thread Scott Wood
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 07:02:56 -0500 Kumar Gala wrote: > The only reason to require a dma_ops struct is to see if it has > implemented set_dma_mask. If not we can fall back to setting the mask > directly. > > This resolves an issue with how to sequence the setting of a DMA mask > for platform dev

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: Dont require a dma_ops struct to set dma mask

2011-06-22 Thread Kumar Gala
The only reason to require a dma_ops struct is to see if it has implemented set_dma_mask. If not we can fall back to setting the mask directly. This resolves an issue with how to sequence the setting of a DMA mask for platform devices. Before we had an issue in that we have no way of setting the

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: Dont require a dma_ops struct to set dma mask

2010-08-05 Thread Kumar Gala
The only reason to require a dma_ops struct is to see if it has implemented set_dma_mask. If not we can fall back to setting the mask directly. This resolves an issue with how to sequence the setting of a DMA mask for platform devices. Before we had an issue in that we have no way of setting the