Re: [PATCH 3/3] i2c/ibm-iic: drop NO_IRQ

2010-02-16 Thread Grant Likely
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote: > Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq' > (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is > only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang > Cc: Sean MacLennan

[PATCH 3/3] i2c/ibm-iic: drop NO_IRQ

2009-10-22 Thread Wolfram Sang
Drop NO_IRQ as 0 is the preferred way to describe 'no irq' (http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/221). This change is safe, as the driver is only used on powerpc, where NO_IRQ is 0 anyhow. Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang Cc: Sean MacLennan Cc: Ben Dooks --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ibm_iic.c | 14 +