>> +
>> +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec)
>> +{
>> +}
>
>shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ?
>
>Thanks,
> tglx
I have prepared implementation of this function which sent me JW.
I did some changes which I test it because I found problem there.
M
_
On Thu, 26 Jun 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> +
> +static inline void udelay(unsigned long usec)
> +{
> +}
shouldnt this function be named zerodelay() ?
Thanks,
tglx
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/m
From: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-microblaze/delay.h | 30 ++
include/asm-microblaze/timex.h | 18 ++
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 include
